Review of Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury

This my first reading of this classic. I guess my school didn’t consider it worth it even though it is only 158 pages. Reading this for the first time after 50 likely makes my judgement more harsh as I have no childhood obsession to defend. I didn’t like this book. I liked the last 20 pages or so but I think it would have been better shorter as the first 100 pages were a struggle for me. I have a half baked theory that the reason so many people adore this book is because they place so much emotional value on physical books and the idea of burning them is such sacrilege that this book grabbed them at a deep level.

I’m not saying this book is worthless. The images of our society rotting from the inside because we grab our attention with fantasy resonates in this century even more than last. The idea that through books and memory and remembering we can make this a better place fills me hope. This is my first Ray Bradbury novel and maybe I just don’t like his writing style. Given that it’s so short I think everybody should read it because it does speak to our current century and our struggles with attention and our disdain for old thoughts because they don’t sound cool or can’t be put in a tweet.

Here are some of my favorite quotes from the book.

School is shortened, discipline relax, philosophies, histories, languages dropped, English and spelling gradually gradually neglected, finally almost completely ignored. Life is immediate, the job counts, pleasure lies all about after work. Why learn anything save pressing buttons, pulling switches, fitting nuts and bolts?

Page 53

Bigger the population, the more minorities. Don’t step on the toes of the dog lovers, the cat lovers, doctors, lawyers, merchants, chiefs, mormons, baptist, unitarians, second generation chinese, sweets, italians, germans, texas, brooklynites, irishman, people from Oregon or mexico. People in this book, this play, this TV serial are not meant to represent any actual painters, cartographers, mechanics anywhere. The bigger your market, montag, the less you handle controversy, remember that!

Page 54-55

If you hide your ignorance, no one will hit you and you’ll

Page 100

Give a man a few lines of verse and he thinks he’s the Lord of all Creation. You think you can walk on water with your books. Well, the world can get by just fine without them. Look where they got you, and slime up to your lip. If I stir the slime with my little finger, you’ll drown.

Page 111-112

A lot will be lost that way, of course. But you can’t make people listen. They have to come round in their own time, wondering what happened and why the world blew up under them. It can’t last.

Page 146

Grandfather’s been dead for all these years, but if you lifted my skull, by God, and the convolutions of my brain you’d find the big ridges of his thumbprint. He touched me. As I said, earlier, he was a sculptor.

Page 150

And it looks like we’re doing the same thing, over and over, but we’ve got one damn thing the Phoenix never had. We know the damn silly thing we just did. We know all the damn silly things we’ve done for a thousand years and as long as we know that and always have it around where we can see it, someday we’ll stop making the goddamn funeral pyres and jumping in the middle of them. We pick up a few more people that remember, every generation.

Page 156

And hold on to one thought: You’re not important. You’re not anything. Someday the load we’re carrying with us may help someone. But even when we had the books on hand, a long time ago, we didn’t use what we got out of them. We went right on insulting the dead. We went right on spitting in the graves of all the poor ones who died before it. We’re going to meet a lot of lonely people in the next week and the next month and the next year. And when they ask us what we’re doing, you can say, we’re remembering. That’s where we’ll win out in the long run. And someday we’ll remember so much that we’ll build the biggest goddamn steam shovel in history and dig the biggest grave of all time and shove war in and cover it up. Come on now, we’re going to go build a mirror factory first and put out nothing but mirrors for the next year and take a long look in them.

Page 156-157

Review of 1984 by George Orwell

I read this book in highschool and there is no way I understood it back then. This book has some deep themes that resonate in 2022 and everyone would gain something by reading again or for the first time. It is only 284 pages.

Some of the best parts are known by many, even those who have not read it. Some of my favorite classic lines:

“Big Brother is Watching You.”
“War Is Peace, Freedom Is Slavery, and Ignorance Is Strength”
“If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.”

And some that are more meaningful to me now:

“Who controls the past controls the future”
“The best books… are those that tell you what you know already.”
“Does big brother exist like I have exist? You don’t exist.”
“It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words.”

The most impactful part of the story was when Winston moved to the second stage of reintegration, understanding:

“He knew in advance what O’Brien would say: that the party did not seek power for its own ends, but only for the good of the majority. That it sought power because men in the mass were frail cowardly creatures who could not endured Liberty or face to truth, I must be ruled over and systematically deceived by others who were stronger than themselves. It’s a choice for mankind lay between freedom and happiness and that for the great bulk of mankind, happiness was better.”

This is a common take on socialism. Another form comes from The Wrath of Khan: “The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.” What Orwell does is show that this is just not true as O’Brien says:

“The party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power. Not wealth or luxury or long life or happiness; only power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently.”

I have some qualms about this book but they are overwhelmed by the lasting impact of this book. A true must read!

Review of The Premonition by Michael Lewis

I loved this book*. This is my fourth Michael Lewis book and I have liked every one. One of the reasons I enjoyed this book as much as I did is my past obsession with COVID-19. In 2020, I read less than half as many books as the year before because I read so many articles and papers on COVID. I also have a dislike of bureaucracy and therefore any book that exposed incompetence of a large government agency is confirming my bias. Let’s face nothing is better than a good bias confirmation!

One of the reasons I enjoy Lewis’s writing is his use of characters and their backgrounds. The first character I met was Dr Charity Dean. Lewis tells of how she handled being the health officer of Santa Barbara county. It was amazing how she took the bull by the horns and did unpopular things some of which paid out and some of which didn’t. She comes back in the story later as part of Gavin Newsom’s health department.

In the next character I met was Bob Glass. Bob, now retired from Sandia, led a team studying the impacts of social distancing. When his daughter Laura was 13 she was watching him play with his model. On the screen were all these green dots and one red dot, and they moved, he explained, according to rules that he wrote for them.  Laura looked at the model and she said, “That could be the science fair project because that reminds me of the way disease spreads.” She had been learning about bubonic plague. So she set about modeling disease. In 2006, Bob & Laura with Walter Beyeler, a computer scientist at Sandia, published Targeted Social Distancing Designs for Pandemic Influenza. “Bob glass had now read enough about epidemiology to know that his daughter’s project was an original contribution to the field. I asked myself, why didn’t epidemiologists just figure it out? They didn’t figure it out because they didn’t have tools that were focused on the problem.” (p79)**

Next I met Rajeev Venkatya who worked in the GW Bush White House. After Bush read The Great Influenza he asked “What’s our strategy?” (p52) Rajeev says we didn’t have a strategy so he was tasked with the writing one. He did it over a weekend at his parents house. Using this thin plan Bush asked Congress for $7.1 billion in spending to prepare for an influenza pandemic. The book was referred to as “the seven-billion dollar book” (p53) in the white house after that.***

When I met Richard Hatchett, he is a doctor that was working as an oncologist. He received a phone call: “This is Noreen Hynes, from the vice president’s office.” He was annoyed and answered “How can I help you?” while thinking “Vice president of what?” “General Lawlor has read your medical proposal…” He then realized who this was and said “Oh, vice president Cheney” she replied “Is there another vice president?” (p56)

Finally I meet my favorite character, Carter Mecher. He is working in the VA. This exchange between him and an old vet tells a lot about him. “‘What can we do to make you more comfortable?’ he asked. The old vet studied him a beat and then wrote on the board, ‘Beer’. ‘What kind of beer?’ asked Carter.” (p62) He was a true systems thinker. “One way to reduce medical error, he thought, was to redesign the environment to make it more difficult for bad things to happen. “You cannot put 120 volt plug into a 240 volt outlet” he said, by way of analogy. “Why? You can’t do it! You can’t fit it!” In medicine there were too many 120 volt plugs that fit in a 240 volt outlets.” (p69)

Bob’s model makes it to the White House because of this strange set of events: “As it turned out, the guy at the Department of Veterans Affairs who had once dated Bob Glass’s sister actually knew Carter Mecher, and had emailed him everything Bob had sent.” 89+ “a few days after Richard first called him, Bob Glass installed a bed on stilts beside his computer in a shed in the backyard. Each night in Albuquerque, he ran computer simulations of various pandemics, and various responses to them, so these guys he never met could have the answers when they arrived at work in the morning.” (p81)

“Carter invented a name what they were doing. “Redneck epidemiology,” he called it. It took just a few months for them to piece together what it actually happened in 1918. Their paper appeared in the May 2007 issue of the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.” 103 Public Health Interventions in Epidemic Intensity During the 1918 Influenza Pandemic

One of the more impressive characters is Joe DeRisi, a winner of a MacArthur’s grant, co-president of the Chan Zuckerberg Biolab and helped to develop the ViroChip. “The Virochip, as it was called, was actually a glass Microsoft slide. It surface hell genetic sequences from every known virus. The sequences, along with the genetic information of living creatures, were stored in a federally funded database called GenBank, inside the National institutes of Health.” (p141) Known viruses would stick on the chip and unknown viruses would stick to one or more related virus so you could find out how new viruses were related to known viruses. Truly remarkable stuff that had him sent to talk to some secret agency in Tysons Corner (an extension DC sprawl in northern VA for those not familiar.) On a flight home from Cambodia on January 10, 2020 he changed planes in Guangdong, China. “They were now lots of security people wearing masks. Passengers were required to step, one by one, inside an acrylic stall and be scammed for fever… ” I thought, these people know something we don’t.” (p159)

“Carter and Richard had never really stopped working together. Around them a small group had formed. Seven men, all doctors.” (p163) Carter, Richard, Rajeev Venkayya (big Asian drug company), Duane Caneva & James Lawler (US Navy) and Matt Hepburn & Dave Marcozzi (US Army) “They even been given a name: Wolverines.” (p164)****

This is told from Richard’s POV: “Fire was his favorite metaphor to convey how hard it was for people to wake up to a threat that grew exponentially. One fire in particular had captivated his and Richard’s imagination when they read of it years earlier.” The Mann Gulch fire killed 15 young fire fighters because it moves through tall grass so fast and they were walking downhill towards the river which they planned on using as their safety escape only to find the fire across the river it must coming their way. “10 minutes later, at 5:55, the fire was traveling at 7 miles per hour. One minute later, at 5:56, the hands of the wristwatch of one of the young men melted in place: that’s how the investigators determined exactly when 10 of the 15 had burned to death, some still carrying their heavy backpacks and Pulaski axes.” (p171)

One sickening story comes from one of the first group of Americans quarantined in National guard base just outside of Omaha, near the global center for health security run by James Lawler (a wolverine.) “The CDC sent one of its epidemiologists to visit James Lawler. The end of the meeting, the guy said he needed to check with Atlanta. The next day I get to panic call from him, quote said Lawler. ” It’s gone all the way up to redfield. He said, ” you can’t do it!” I said why? He said I would be doing quote research on imprisons persons ” never mind that every single one of the 57 Americans and quarantined wanted to be tested: the CDC forbade it.” (p176)

Carter using all the data he could find, and at that time it wasn’t much, to estimate the case fatality rate between .5% and 1.5% and it would infect between 20 and 40% of the US population if the government did nothing. He wrote a note to himself January 27th 2020 that “the virus would kill between 900,000 and 1.8 Americans.” (p177) As of April 16th 2022 that number stands at 1,015,357. I’d call that prophetic!

In February 2020, Dwayne Caneve asked Charity Dean to look at a bunch of old emails he labeled “Red Dawn.” Soon after that Charity became a member of the Wolverines. At this point Charity is assistant director of health for the state of California. After the head of the health department, who hired her, left the governor picked Sonia Angell (As a character in one of my favorite movies would say “you have chosen poorly”)

Joe, of the Chan Zuckerberg Biolab, decided in March 2020 to turn his lab into a COVID-19 testing facility. It was free of charge and yet they found very few people would use it. The reason sickens me. In an exchange with the Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital they said “we don’t know how to do no cost”What do you mean ask the lab ” it shows up as an error in the hospital computer if we put zero cost” (p248)

Near the end of the book Lewis writes about a book called The Swine Flu Affair, about the 1976 attempt by the CDC to vaccinate people against an up-and-coming swine flu. They only managed to vaccinate roughly 20% of the people and the swine flu wasn’t that bad. There was lots of bad press about people dying from the vaccine. The book put all the blame on the head of the CDC at the time, David Sencer. The book came out after he’d already been fired by President Reagan and then he become an alcoholic because of the depression. Richard and Carter invited him to the White House and President Obama took an interest in the meeting. Just before he died he at least was validated. I like good stories that have a somewhat happy ending.

*This book was published May 4th 2021 which means most of what was written was in 2020.

**The number following p (or numbers following pp) in parentheses is the page number from the  book. Didn’t know how to do it so Google led me to The University of Western Australia!

***Congress approved $3.8 billion with $3.3 billion for the Public Health and Social Services Emergency Fund to boost pandemic preparations. The money includes (Source):

  • $350 million for upgrading state and local response capacity
  • $267 million for “international activities, surveillance, vaccine registries, research, and clinical trials”
  • $50 million to increase laboratory capacity through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

****If I have to tell you that reference then we can’t possibly know each other!

Climate Change Conundrum

I’m reading my morning email from the New York Times and it causes me pause. The headline is fine “Good morning. We have reason for hope on climate change.” It’s the first section, “Against despair”, that gets my goat (I like Urban Dictionary’s sub definition: “The goat is a metaphor for your state of peacefulness”). Here is the opening paragraph or so:

Among the headline-grabbing wildfires, droughts and floods, it is easy to feel disheartened about climate change.

I felt this myself when a United Nations panel released the latest major report on global warming. It said that humanity was running out of time to avert some of the worst effects of a warming planet. Another report is coming tomorrow. So I called experts to find out whether my sense of doom was warranted.

To my relief, they pushed back against the notion of despair.

NYT The Morning By German Lopez

I can think of few organizations who have pushed climate change alarmism that have had a greater negative effect on American people’s outlook of the future than the New York Times. Now they realize, or at least allow someone to voice, that this is a problem! They write that a “survey of young people in 10 countries last year, 75 percent of respondents said the future was frightening” as if it’s news and they are not culpable! Later after some it’s not all bad news they show this graph. Notice the future predictions are based on policy (interesting choice of words.) The Climate Action Tracker is an independent scientific analysis that tracks government climate action and measures it against the globally agreed Paris Agreement….now I understand the word choice. 🤓

Dunking on the NYT is easy and is not why I am writing this. The above graph got me thinking…which is usually a good thing. What is the current best guess (prediction) about future global temperatures? How and what are we doing about it? Didn’t I read something last month about the IPCC? One advantage of having Google track your every move is that they were easily able to bring up Judith Curry’s post A ‘Plan B’ for addressing climate change and the energy transition that I read on March 24th…not creepy at all. Then I remembered an excellent interview that I listened to by Isaac Saul on his podcast Tangle titled Scott Tinker on the future of energy. Instead of me summarizing I’ll copy Tangle’s summary.

Scott Tinker is an energy expert, geologist, and documentary filmmaker trying to carve out the “radical middle” on the future of energy. In today’s podcast, he discusses both the reasons we need to move away from oil (or make it cleaner) while also diving into the myths of “renewable” energy, which he says simply is not a thing. Tinker breaks down the pros and cons of fossil fuels, solar, electric vehicles, nuclear energy and much more.

Tangle INTERVIEW: Scott Tinker on the future of energy by Isaac Saul

Most of this is in my frontal lobe at this point so I looked up the latest IPCC report and found this graph – you can even download the data.

Figure: SPM.3 Climate Change 2022 Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability

I remembered that SSP5-8.5 was not a scenario most scientists believed to be likely but it was the scenario most often cited in non-scientific publications such as NYT 🤓 I realize I have a certain bias so I did a little googling and found the nugget below. For those who like to deep dive there is Why do climate change scenarios return to coal?

According to the researchers who developed it, RCP8.5 was intended to be a “very high baseline emission scenario” representing the 90th percentile of no-policy baseline scenarios available at the time.

Carbon Brief’s Explainer: The high-emissions ‘RCP8.5’ global warming scenario

At this point you may be thinking does he have a point? I thought he said he wasn’t going to just dunk the NYT. I have been interested in climate change for the last 20 years. Although I have no formal education in climate science, I do have a masters in computer science from Georgia Tech and I’m a pretty good comprehender of models and math and whatnot from my 30+ years of writing software. I find climate change to be a truly wicked problem.

The mainstream media has engaged in what can best be described as propaganda with regard to climate change. They will attribute everything bad to climate change. They will use the most extreme predictions and if there’s a PhD saying that obesity is caused by climate change he’s on CNN 24/7! People who question some of the proclamations are labeled deniers and deplatformed (e.g. The Depravity of Climate-Change Denial – never guess which outlet this is from :-). That’s religious talk. Science is about questioning and proving and striving for the truth that you may never attain. Models are representation of reality and by definition inaccurate. I find weather and climate models to be fairly accurate given what they’re trying to model. I can see from my favorite weather site that rain is coming Tuesday night and I have no doubt that it will. People take it for granted but I find that amazing!*

It’s clear that pumping CO2 and methane into the atmosphere at the rate we are doing it is causing changes to our global environment. To paraphrase Scott Tinker from the interview mentioned above: last time I checked we all breathe the same air and drink the same water. It’s also clear that the G7 (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States) cannot solve this problem. As Judith Curry states in the previously mentioned article, “By 2050, global emissions will be dominated by whatever China and India have done, or have failed to do.”

Our World in Data – CO₂ and Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Scott Tinker states it well when he says the solution is to stop calling energy green** or dirty. A combination of all forms (solar, wind, hydro, nuclear, natural gas and coal) is what we need. The wealthiest 10% of the world’s population consumes about 20 times as much energy as the poorest 10% of the world’s population, according to a study of 86 countries from researchers at Leeds University, BBC News reported. To deny the poorest among us the benefits of energy is the worst form of snobbery. Luckily there are those among us doing something about it like the Switch Energy Alliance.

Global warming must be solved on a global scale and nuclear energy has to be part of any sensible plan. Carbon taxes (which I endorse) or some pie in the sky green new deal is only masking the real issue. Asia and Africa must be brought online in a sensible fashion. Calling those you disagree with deniers or unbelievers helps no one. Labeling energy green or dirty only shows your ignorance. Climate Change is the really Too Big to Fail issue of our lifetime and is a true conundrum!

*Climate models and weather models are different beasts but when I was writing my thoughts led me to weather. Earlier this year I had read some pundit claim that climate models were no better than economic models so they sucked. I pulled up the 2001 IPCC report that had model predictions out to 2100. If you look at the graph they had 2020 between .4C and .8C warmer that 2000 and in actually it was about .5C. I would call that a pretty good prediction.

** Renewable and sustainable are also buzzwords used to push the environmental impact towards non G7 countries. Where does the metal come from for the beloved Tesla battery? What do we do with these batteries when they are used up? Just because there is no CO2 coming out of your tailpipe does not mean you have not had a negative impact on the environment!

Folding Proteins?

Origami

I remember in 1997, when Deep Blue beat Garry Kasparov in chess. In December 1999, IBM announced a new challenge. Their next supercomputer, Blue Gene, was going to tackle… protein folding!? They set a goal of 5 years and set aside $100 million. I figured I read about it in 5 years or less given that it took less than 8 years to conquer chess. Chess had to be harder than protein folding…clearly I was mistaken.

This memory was sparked when this article crossed my news feed: DeepMind AI cracks 50-year-old problem of protein folding. Initially I was thinking IBM had finally done it as I remembered Deep Blue’s name. No, it was Google and their AI research arm Deep Mind. Seeing that it had been more than 20 years since I first heard of protein folding I decided to do some digging.

Proteins are made of up to 20 different types of amino acids. Attraction and repulsion of the amino acids in a protein cause the string to fold. This happens soon after the protein is created, usually in milliseconds although the very fastest known protein folding reactions are complete within a few microseconds. There are an estimated 10^300 possible formations for a typical protein. Given that the number of legal chess positions is 10^40, I think I now know why Blue Gene was never successful using just raw computing power.

AlphaFold, the Deep Mind project started in 2016 to solve protein folding, uses a neural network similar to the one used to play go, AlphaGo, and chess, AlphaZero. The news was made because it crushed the competition at CASP14, Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction held every two years starting in 1994. The also did the best at CASP13 with a Global Distance Test (GDT) of just under 60. The latest was an improvement greater than 50% with a score of 92.6. This score means that their predictions have an average error of approximately 1.6 Angstroms, which is comparable to the width of an atom! That is an impressive accomplishment but what’s the point?

Derek Lowe, my favorite science writer, did a good job putting this advancement into perspective. “One of our biggest difficulties is choosing the wrong target. No, really. We have all sorts of compounds that make it into human trials and then don’t actually work, because it turns out that our hypothesis about the underlying disease was just wrong. It’s hard to overemphasize this: we don’t know enough about human biology to make sure, much of the time, that we have grasped the right end of the stick.”

Basically, this another really hard problem that we can add in the computer column of wins, but it won’t really do anything by itself. To quote AlphaFold: “These results open up the potential for biologists to use computational structure prediction as a core tool in scientific research.” It’s a neat tool, but we still need smart people with new ideas to use it.

Sources

COVID-19 Immunity Likely Lasts

The Nature paper, SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls, states “infection with betacoronaviruses induces multispecific and long-lasting T cell immunity to the structural protein NP.” It also shows that “SARS-recovered patients (n=23) still possess long-lasting memory T cells reactive to SARS-NP 17 years after the 2003 outbreak”

To understand that I needed to lookup what NP or nucleocapsid protein means to Covid-19. “The SARS-CoV-2 genome contains approximately 30 kilobases that encode four structural proteins: spike, envelope, membrane, and nucleocapsid.” NP is that last one.

“The SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein is integral for viral self-assembly and is involved with regulation of the cell cycle.” So it seams that if you recover from Covid-19 you will be immune for a long time. That is much needed good news.

Sources:

Tetraquark Discovered in Old Data

Tetraquark

The LHCb (Large Hadron Collider beauty) experiment is one of eight particle physics detector experiments collecting data at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. On July 1st, maybe to celebrate Canada day, the “LHCb collaboration submitted a paper reporting the discovery of a possible tetraquark candidate, composed of two charm quarks and two charm antiquarks, referred to as the X(6900) in the paper.” I think they need a better name, maybe double-charm quadron?

Quarks are fundamental particles that combine to form hadrons. The most stable hadrons are protons and neutrons. Protons contain two up quarks and one down quark. Neutrons contain one up quark and two down quarks. Charm quarks are the third most massive behind up and down of the first generation. There are three generations of quarks with gen 2 containing charm and strange and gen 3 having top and bottom. That’s as far as I can understand. “For decades, however, theorists have predicted the existence of four-quark and five-quark hadrons, which are sometimes described as tetraquarks and pentaquarks” Now we have evidence of this theory in data from the LHC.

What’s interesting to me is they found this particle by data mining experiments from over 7 years ago. “The LHCb team found the new tetraquark using the particle-hunting technique of looking for an excess of collision events, known as a “bump”, over a smooth background of events. Sifting through the full LHCb datasets from the first and second runs of the Large Hadron Collider, which took place from 2009 to 2013 and from 2015 to 2018 respectively, the researchers detected a bump in the mass distribution of particles, which consist of a charm quark and a charm antiquark.”

Sources:

Mac getting an ARM

RadioShack TRS-80 zmodel III

I got my first PC in the early 80s. It was a RadioShack TRS-80 Model III. It ran MS-DOS. I have been using Microsoft computers pretty much non-stop until 2020. The MacBook pro I am currently using for work is speedy, nice to use and brings me back to my Unix days in the 90s. It uses an Intel chip, but that is likely going to change.

Apple is going to announce it will start using it’s ARM (Advance RISC (Reduced Instruction Set Computer) Machine) chips in their Macintosh line. My first thought was who cares, but I then read two different blog posts on it and both made it interesting. I won’t go to deep into the details as you can read the links below. I was so impressed with the Apple A12 released in 2018 for the iPhone I almost got one. Now they are looking even better.

One interesting aspect is the software development perspective. “A chronic problem for competing processors has always been that developers couldn’t develop code on them. As a developer, I simply don’t have access to computers running IBM’s POWER processors. Thus, I can’t optimize my code for them.”

Another interesting thing is the speed improvements made by Apple. Not too long ago, anyone comparing Intel to an ARM chip would be laughed at because it wasn’t fair. Intel owned the PC and server market because they had the best performance. ARM chips were only good for devices because of their low power usage.

Comparing the A13 (released September 2019) to Intel’s Core i9-9900K (released October 2018): “In single core, the difference is -20%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 46%” using Geekbench 4 (“benchmark platform with several types of tests”). The i9 has 33% more cores and over 100% more threads. I know the next gen Intel is due out next year but that only takes their size to 10nm while Apple has been 7nm since the A12. I think Intel might be in trouble.

Sources:

NIH Probe Into Foreign Ties

Who knew that there was “an ongoing investigation by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) into the failure of NIH grantees to disclose financial ties to foreign governments. In 93% of those cases, the hidden funding came from a Chinese institution.” Fifty-four scientists have either resigned or have been fired!

One high profile case involves Charles Lieber, an inorganic chemist at Harvard. “It was the amount of money involved that drew our attention,” says Andrew Lelling, U.S. attorney for the Massachusetts district. Court documents indicate Lieber received $50,000 a month in salary and millions of dollars in research support. Lelling continues, “That is a corrupting level of money.” This investigation involved 399 scientists and 87 institutions. Sadly, nothing is free of the corruption of money.

“Michael Lauer, NIH’s head of extramural research”, I had to Google that – means outside the walls or boundaries of a town, college, or institution, released the ACD Working Group on Foreign Influences on Research Integrity Update on Friday, June 12, 2020. Some of the data:

  • Total dollars of all active grants $164 million
  • NIH grant support per scientist $678K ($383K to $1.29M)
  • Number of active grants 285
  • Number institutions contacted 87
  • Acknowledged non-compliance 62 (71%)

Source: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/fifty-four-scientists-have-lost-their-jobs-result-nih-probe-foreign-ties

Secondary source: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/02/us-prosecutor-leading-china-probe-explains-effort-led-charges-against-harvard-chemist

NIH report: https://acd.od.nih.gov/documents/presentations/06122020ForeignInfluences.pdf

Milky Way Magnetar

Magnetar
© PITRIS/DREAMSTIME.COM

The beginning of this article is beautifully written: “On 28 April, as Earth’s rotation swept a Canadian radio telescope across the sky, it watched for mysterious millisecondslong flashes called fast radio bursts (FRBs).” What makes this discovery interesting is: “Because of its brightness, the team knew its source was nearby. All other FRBs seen so far have erupted in distant galaxies—too far and too fast to figure out what produced them.”

The team at Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME), has a nice ring to it ;-), determined that the FRB was “definitely colocated” with a “Milky Way magnetar—a neutron star with a powerful magnetic field—flinging out bursts of x-rays and gamma rays.” That magnetar has the name SGR 1935+2154. Who has the job of naming them? I’d like a nickname added – let’s call it blasty!

This finding has the chance to be significant. From a linked paper: “A leading model for repeating FRBs is that they are extragalactic magnetars, powered by their intense magnetic fields. However, a challenge to this model has been that FRBs must have radio luminosities many orders of magnitude larger than those seen from known Galactic magnetars.” There are doubts, “this burst was 30 times less energetic than the weakest FRB traced to another galaxy.” Another problem is that “five of the 30 known magnetars in the Milky Way have been seen to emit weak radio signals, and SGR 1935+2154 is not one of them.”

A sign of interesting science is disagreement. “Pretty much every modeler who had previously considered how magnetars could generate an FRB has now said, within days, that they are right,” says Victoria Kaspi, an astronomer at McGill University and a CHIME leader. “They can’t all be right.”

Some history: “The first FRB was detected in 2007, and astronomers have tallied a little over 100 since then. Their brevity makes them hard to study or trace to a particular celestial object. But several FRBs have been found to repeat, giving astronomers a chance to identify their host galaxy. And in the past year or two, wide-field telescopes such as CHIME, designed to survey large swaths of the sky, have begun to boost the number of detections substantially.”

Main source: https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/06/galactic-flash-points-long-sought-source-enigmatic-radio-bursts

Secondary source: https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.10324